allthelenders review.

allthelenders is a trading name of Warwick Financial Services, a UK credit broker authorised under FCA reference 622839 and operating since 2012. The firm differs from most directory broker peers in its presentation model: rather than running a single matching algorithm that returns one lender, allthelenders displays a comparison list of FCA-regulated lenders ranked by total amount repayable. The borrower then chooses which lender to apply to. The interface is closer to a price-comparison site than a black-box matcher and is most useful for borrowers who want to see and weigh options themselves.

Active Credit broker Established 2012 Verified May 2026

Key facts

allthelenders presents a comparison-style list rather than a single match. The figures below describe the panel scope and ranking methodology, verified on 4 May 2026.

Panel scope
Short-term + bad-credit
Bad-credit panel range
£250 to £15,000
Term range
18 to 60 months
Interface
Comparison list
Ranking
Total cost ascending
Customer fee
None

Bad-credit personal-loan panel covers £250 to £15,000 over 18 to 60 months. Short-term loan panel sits alongside under separate FCA price-cap rules. Results are ranked by total amount repayable to the borrower rather than by lender preference or commission rate. allthelenders publishes that no lender pays for higher placement. The site does not cover the whole UK lending market and the ranking applies only to lenders the firm has agreements with.

Operational strengths

Comparison-list interface gives the borrower control

Where most directory broker peers run a black-box matching algorithm and return one lender, allthelenders presents a list of lenders ranked side-by-side and lets the borrower pick. The mechanism is closer in feel to a price-comparison site than a typical loan broker. Borrowers see total amount repayable, term, monthly instalment and APR for each option before choosing where to apply. The transparency suits applicants who want to weigh trade-offs themselves rather than accept the algorithm's first answer.

Ranking by total cost rather than commission

allthelenders publishes that results are ranked by total amount repayable to the borrower, in ascending order. The firm states explicitly that no lender pays for higher placement. The position is unusual in the broker market and matters because the matching-algorithm models used by most peers are opaque on commission incentives. Borrowers concerned that broker matching might privilege higher-commission lenders over cheaper ones can use allthelenders' published methodology as a structural counterweight.

Long operational history

Warwick Financial Services has been running the allthelenders brand since 2012, predating the FCA's 2014 takeover of consumer credit regulation and the subsequent price cap. The firm has therefore operated through a complete cycle of regulatory change in the UK short-term sector. Long operational continuity in this market is unusual and signals an ability to adapt to changing rules without losing licence or trading status.

Specialist panel on bad-credit personal loans

Beyond short-term loans, allthelenders runs a separate panel of bad-credit personal loan providers covering £250 to £15,000 over 18 to 60 months. The product type is one a typical short-term broker does not handle. Borrowers needing a larger, longer-term loan but with adverse credit history can use the comparison interface to compare across multiple specialist lenders in a single visit rather than apply to several individually.

Material considerations

Cost

The site does not cover the whole UK lending market

allthelenders publishes that its panel does not represent the whole market. The comparison list ranks the lenders the firm has commercial agreements with, not every lender available in the UK. Borrowers using the comparison should treat the displayed rates as a representative sample of what is available rather than as a definitive lowest-rate guarantee. Cross-checking against a direct lender or a different broker before signing helps confirm the matched offer is genuinely competitive for the borrower's circumstances.

Each chosen lender still runs its own hard search

The comparison interface is informational. Once the borrower picks a lender from the displayed list, the application is forwarded and the chosen lender then performs a hard credit search before issuing an offer. Applying to several lenders from the comparison list in quick succession produces several hard footprints, the same outcome a borrower would get by applying to those lenders directly without the broker. The advantage of allthelenders is in surfacing options for comparison, not in eliminating the credit-file impact of multiple full applications.

Two domains can cause confusion

allthelenders operates from two URLs (allthelenders.org.uk and allthelenders.co.uk), with the comparison content sometimes presented differently across the two. Borrowers checking the firm's regulatory status should confirm both domains route to Warwick Financial Services under FCA reference 622839. The dual-domain structure is not unusual for long-running broker brands but can complicate verification for applicants checking the FCA register.

Commission-based revenue

Like all UK consumer credit brokers, allthelenders earns commission from the lender when a borrower successfully takes out a loan. The firm's published policy is that commission rates do not affect ranking, which is determined by total cost to the borrower. The position is the broker's stated practice rather than a regulatory guarantee. Borrowers who want strict independence should still cross-check the displayed offer against a direct application or another broker before committing.

Most appropriate & Least appropriate

The comparison-list model rewards borrowers who want to do the choosing themselves. It works less well for applicants who'd rather have an algorithm decide and just see one outcome. The two columns map the divide.

Most Appropriate

The right fit

  • Borrower wants to compare lenders side-by-side before applying
  • Total amount repayable matters more than algorithmic convenience
  • Bad-credit personal loan over 18 to 60 months is the use case
  • Independence from commission-driven matching algorithms is a priority
Least Appropriate

Look elsewhere

  • Borrower wants a single soft search and one matched offer (use CashLady or Little Loans instead)
  • Strong credit profile likely to qualify for high-street rates
  • Need is for a single small short-term loan with same-day funding
  • Borrower plans to apply to several listed lenders rather than just one

The application process

The allthelenders journey is structured around the comparison list rather than around a single matching algorithm. The flow runs across three distinct steps before any hard credit search occurs.

1

Loan parameters and eligibility check

The borrower enters the desired loan amount, repayment term and basic eligibility data. allthelenders runs a soft eligibility screen against its panel and presents the lenders the borrower is most likely to qualify with. The eligibility step does not affect the credit score and is reversible: borrowers can adjust amount or term to see how the displayed list changes.

2

Browse the ranked comparison

Eligible lenders are displayed in a list ranked by total amount repayable, ascending. Each entry shows the APR, monthly instalment, term and total cost for the requested loan parameters. The borrower can scroll through the list, compare entries side-by-side and read each lender's published terms before making a choice.

3

Click through to the chosen lender

Selecting a lender from the list redirects the borrower to that lender's website. The chosen lender then runs its own application flow, including a hard credit search, affordability assessment and credit agreement. Funding speeds and product features are determined by the chosen lender. Borrowers should review the agreement carefully before signing.

Comparable alternatives

Three FCA authorised Lenders
worth considering.

Two matching-algorithm peer brokers and one direct lender give a practical comparison set for borrowers choosing between broker styles.

CashLady

Matching-algorithm broker under Digitonomy authorisation. Single soft search returns one matched lender rather than a ranked list. Suits borrowers who want the algorithm to make the choice.

Little Loans

Sister brand to CashLady, also under Digitonomy authorisation. Same matching-algorithm approach and same panel scope. A second algorithm-based option for borrowers who want a single matched outcome.

My Financial Broker

Smaller-panel broker (~25 lenders) covering both unsecured short-term loans and a separate secured-loan panel. Higher panel mean APR than the Digitonomy brokers, reflecting a panel weighted toward higher-cost lenders.

Sources and verification

Panel structure, ranking methodology and operational details verified against allthelenders.co.uk on 4 May 2026.

Regulatory status verified on the FCA register under firm reference 622839 (Warwick Financial Services).

Swift Money Limited is itself a credit broker. Inclusion of allthelenders in this directory is purely informational and does not imply a commercial relationship between the two firms. We are authorised and regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, FRN 738569.

Frequently asked

allthelenders questions, answered.

How is allthelenders different from CashLady or Little Loans?

The structural difference is the interface and the matching method. CashLady and Little Loans run a black-box matching algorithm and return a single matched lender to the borrower. allthelenders presents a comparison list of eligible lenders and lets the borrower pick. The first model is faster and lower-friction. The second gives the borrower more visibility into trade-offs and more control. Neither is universally better. The choice depends on whether the borrower wants the algorithm to decide or wants to weigh options themselves.

Does allthelenders cover every lender in the UK?

No. allthelenders publishes openly that the panel does not cover the whole UK market. The comparison ranks lenders the firm has agreements with, not every FCA-authorised lender available. The position is honest disclosure rather than a flaw. It applies in some form to every panel-based broker in the UK. Borrowers concerned about whole-market coverage should cross-check the displayed ranking against direct lender sites or against a different broker before signing the agreement.

Why rank by total amount repayable rather than APR?

Total amount repayable captures the full pound cost the borrower will actually pay across the term, including all fees and interest. APR alone can mislead on shorter loans because the figure annualises a cost that is held for less than a year. A 600% APR loan held for 30 days can cost less in absolute pounds than a 50% APR loan held for 36 months on the same principal. For borrowers comparing offers, the total-repayable figure is the unambiguous answer to the question "what will I actually pay". Ranking on that metric reduces the risk of a borrower being misled by a lower APR that hides a longer overall term.

Does lender commission affect the ranking position?

allthelenders publishes that no lender pays for higher placement and that ranking is determined by total amount repayable to the borrower in ascending order. The position is the firm's stated practice, set out in its disclosures rather than enforced by an external auditor. Borrowers who want full assurance can cross-check the displayed ordering by manually comparing two or three of the listed lenders' published representative examples. If the order matches the firm's stated methodology, the practice is operating as advertised.

Will using allthelenders affect my credit score?

Browsing the comparison list and running the eligibility check uses a soft search that does not affect the credit score. A hard credit search only happens once the borrower selects a lender from the list and proceeds with that lender's full application. Borrowers who view several entries on the comparison without selecting one trigger no hard searches. The mechanism is the same as price-comparison sites in other regulated industries.

Why does allthelenders have two different domains?

Both allthelenders.org.uk and allthelenders.co.uk route to Warwick Financial Services under FCA reference 622839. The dual-domain structure is a legacy of the firm's long history (the brand has been operating since 2012) and of the .org.uk domain being the original site before the .co.uk version was added. Both versions display the firm's FCA reference number and contact details in their footers. Borrowers verifying the firm should confirm the FCA reference matches 622839 regardless of which domain they accessed.

Get started

Apply for a short term loan in
under 2 minutes

A single soft search application returns offers from multiple regulated lenders, including alternatives to the allthelenders comparison route. No impact on your credit file. Receive a decision in seconds.

Apply now